Bottle Versus Syringe Feeding After Palatoplasty: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Lucky Permana Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital / Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Kristaninta Bangun Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6312-9261
  • Clara Menna Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Rizky Amaliah Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14228/gtrn2629

Keywords:

Cleft Palate, Palatoplasty, feeding, syringe, bottle

Abstract

Introduction : Postoperative feeding after palatoplasty should be initiated immediately to maintain nutritional intake while preserving the palatal sutures to avoid trauma or tension that can lead to wound rupture. Currently, there is no consensus on post-palatoplasty preferred feeding method. This study aims to compare bottle versus syringe feeding in post-palatoplasty patients.

Method : A systematic search was conducted in five databases namely PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, and CINAHL, with the following keywords; palatoplasty, cleft palate repair, bottle feeding, syringe feeding, outcome, complication, growth, and nutrition. The selected studies were critically appraised using the Oxford CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) critical appraisal tools.

Result : Two studies were included, with a total of 162 subjects. Both studies found that the formation of postoperative wound dehiscence and weight gain did not significantly differ between bottle and syringe groups. However, faster weight gain was observed in the bottle group. Habits and cultural factors could influence the outcomes of these studies.

Conclusion: Bottle feeding is not significantly inferior to using syringe in terms of short-term postoperative complications, and can be used as an alternative feeding method for post-palatoplasty patients.

References

1. Yow M, Jin A, Yeo GSH. Epidemiologic trends of infants with orofacial clefts in a multiethnic country: a retrospective population-based study. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1-8.

2. Laporan Nasional Riskesdas 2018 [Internet]. Lembaga Penerbit Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan; 2019. Available from: http://repository.bkpk.kemkes.go.id/3514/1/Laporan%20Riskesdas%202018%20Nasional.pdf

3. Salari N, Darvishi N, Heydari M, Bokaee S, Darvishi F, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 000:1–11.

4. Escher PJ, Zavala H, Lee D, Roby BB, Chinnadurai S. Malnutrition as a Risk Factor in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery. Laryngoscope. 2021; 131(6):E2060–5.

5. Mariano NCR, Sano MN, Curvêllo VP, de Almeida ALPF, Neppelenbroek KH, Oliveira TM, et al. Impact of orofacial dysfunction on the quality of life of adult patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2018;55(8):1138-1144.

6. Wu W, Sun J, Liu H, Chen B, Gao Z, Chen Y, et al. Physical Growth Status and Feeding Methods of Chinese Infants With Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate Under 1 Year of Age. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020; 8:1–6.

7. Ramdial S, Madaree A. The spectrum of intraoral bacteria seen in patients with cleft palates in an African setting. MicrobiologyOpen. 2019; 8(4):e00679.

8. Johnson HA. The Immediate Postoperative Care of a Child with Cleft Lip: Time-Proved Suggestions. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1979; 2(5):430–3.

9. Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP. Cleft Palate Speech. Mosby; 2010:418.

10. Assunção AGA, Pinto MAF, Peres SP de BA, Tristão MTC. Immediate postoperative evaluation of the surgical wound and nutritional evolution after cheiloplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42(4):434–8.

11. Augsornwan D, Surakunprapha P, Pattangtanang P, Pongpagatip S, Jenwitheesuk K, Chowchuen B. Comparison of wound dehiscence and parent’s satisfaction between spoon/syringe feeding and breast/bottle feeding in patients with cleft lip repair. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013; 96 Suppl 4: S61-70.

12. Skinner J, Arvedson JC, Jones G, Spinner C, Rockwood J. Post-operative feeding strategies for infants with cleft lip. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 1997; 42(2):169–78.

13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

14. Lo CKL, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):45.

15. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;I4919.

16. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

17. Cohen M, Marschall MA, Schafer ME. Immediate unrestricted feeding of infants following cleft lip and palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 1992;3(1):30–2.

18. Kim EK, Lee TJ, Chae SW. Effect of Unrestricted Bottle-Feeding on Early Postoperative Course After Cleft Palate Repair. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2009;20(8):1886–8.

19. Gailey DG. Feeding Infants with Cleft and the Postoperative Cleft Management. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2016;28(2):153–9. 46.

20. Trettene ADS, Mondini CCDSD, Marques IL. Alimentação da criança no pós-operatório imediato de palatoplastia: comparação entre as técnicas utilizando copo e colher. Rev esc enferm USP. 2013;47(6):1298–304.

21. Jesus MDSV, Reis C. Estudo eletropalatográfico de fones nasais em indivíduo com fissura labiopalatina. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(3):697–706.

22. Cardim VLN, Psillakis JM. Osteotomies in the patients with cleft lip and palate. In: Tratamento das fissuras labiopalatinas. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1996. p. 327-337.

23. Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Mars M, McWilliam J, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(5):413–8.

24. Gil-da-Silva-Lopes VL, Xavier AC, Klein-Antunes D, Ferreira ACRG, Tonocchi R, Fett-Conte AC, et al. Feeding Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in Brazil: Suggestions to Improve Health Policy and Research. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(5):577–90.

25. De Vries IAC, Breugem CC, Van Der Heul AMB, Eijkemans MJC, Kon M, Van Der Molen ABM. Prevalence of feeding disorders in children with cleft palate only: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;18(5):1507-15. DOI:10.1007/s00784-013-1117-x

26. Ize-Iyamu IN, Saheeb BD. Feeding intervention in cleft lip and palate babies: a practical approach to feeding efficiency and weight gain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(9):916–9.

27. Lal V, Rai SK. The Culture of Bottle-feeding. Indian J Community Med. 2009 Jul;34(3):247-8.

Downloads

Published

24-01-2025

How to Cite

1.
Bottle Versus Syringe Feeding After Palatoplasty: A Systematic Review. J Plast Rekons [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 24 [cited 2025 Apr. 28];11(2):44-9. Available from: https://dev.jprjournal.com/index.php/jpr/article/view/369

Similar Articles

11-20 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>