Patients’ Profile of Cleft Lip and Palate : 3 Years Evaluation at Surabaya CLP Center Foundation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14228/qq1rdb42

Keywords:

Orofacial cleft, Congenital, Cheiloplasty, Palatoplasty

Abstract

Introduction: Cleft lip and cleft palate are the most common birth defects affecting newborns, yet their variability across each geographic origin is not clearly understood. This study aims to investigate the CL/P prevalence, profile, and corrective surgery timing in Surabaya, Indonesia.

Method: This retrospective research used a descriptive method by collecting medical data records from the Surabaya CLP Center Foundation from January 2021 to December 2023, which related to sociodemographic problems, clinical features, and management timing were then statistically analyzed.

Results: A total of 495 patients underwent cleft surgery, of which 59.4% were male and 40.6% were female. The most common type of Craniofacial Cleft observed is Combination Cleft Lip and Palate “CLP” (71.1%). CLP is more common in male patients than in female patients (43.4% vs. 27.7%); while CL is more common among males (14.1% vs. 9.7%) and CP is more common in females (3.2% vs. 1.8%). Significantly, complete clefts (72.9%) were more common than the incomplete clefts (27.1%). Unilateral clefts were more common than bilateral clefts (76.2% vs 18.8%). It was observed that only 22% of patients had a family history of CL/P. Overall, 74,9% of patients underwent corrective surgery within the right period.

Conclusions: The data shows that most patients tended to seek medical advice and treatment at appropriate times, suggesting a high awareness of CLP as the result of proactive education and social outreach by the charity institution. Further investigations using data from other institutions are suggested to conclude the CLP management in Surabaya entirely.

Author Biography

  • Febe Alodia Widjaja, General Practitioner, Premier Surabaya Hospital, Surabaya, East Java

    General Practitioner, Premier Surabaya Hospital, Surabaya Indonesia

     

References

1. Zhou X, Jiang Y, Fang J, et al. Incidence of cleft lip and palate, and epidemiology of perinatal deaths related to cleft lip and palate in Hunan Province, China, 2016–2020. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1-7. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37436-y

2. A Oner D, Tastan H. Cleft lip and palate: Epidemiology and etiology. Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;5(4):1-5. doi:10.15761/ohns.1000246

3. Nahas LD, Alzamel O, Dali MY, et al. Distribution And Risk Factors Of Cleft Lip And Palate On Patients From A Sample Of Damascus Hospitals A Case Control Study. Heliyon. 2021;7(9). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07957

4. Sundoro A, Hilmanto D, Soedjana H, Lesmana R, Suryadinata KL. Cleft lip and palate surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: a 36-month experience at the Bandung Cleft Lip and Palate Center. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2023;24(3):111-116. doi:10.7181/acfs.2023.00213

5. Habel A, Sell D, Mars M. Management of cleft lip and palate. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74(4):360-366. doi:10.1136/adc.74.4.360

6. Thorne CH, , Kevin C. Chung, Arun K. Gosain, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, Babak J. Mehrara, J. Peter Rubin SLS. Grabb and Smith ’ S Plastic Surgery.; 2006.

7. Alrasheedi AN, Alshaalan SF, Alruwaili HA. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate in the Northern Region of Saudi Arabia. Aljouf University Medical Journal. 2021;8(4):41-50. doi:10.12816/0059622

8. DIwana V, Gupta G, Chauhan R, et al. Clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with cleft lip and palate anomaly: 10-year experience from a tertiary care center in the sub-himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh in Northern India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2019;10(1):82-86. doi:10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_220_17

9. Vyas T, Gupta P, Kumar S, Gupta R, Gupta T, Singh HP. Cleft of lip and palate: A review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(6):2621-2625. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_472_20

10. van Rooij IALM, Ludwig KU, Welzenbach J, et al. Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Genome-wide association study in Europeans identifies a suggestive risk locus at 16p12.1 and supports SH3PXD2A as a clefting susceptibility gene. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(12). doi:10.3390/genes10121023

11. Triwardhani A, Permatasari GW, Sjamsudin J. Variation of non-syndromic Cleft Lip/Palate in Yayasan Surabaya cleft Lip/Palate Center Surabaya, Indonesia. Journal of International Oral Health. 2019;11(4):187-190. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_6_19

Downloads

Published

24-01-2025

How to Cite

1.
Patients’ Profile of Cleft Lip and Palate : 3 Years Evaluation at Surabaya CLP Center Foundation. J Plast Rekons [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 24 [cited 2025 May 21];11(2):67-73. Available from: https://dev.jprjournal.com/index.php/jpr/article/view/381

Similar Articles

1-10 of 57

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)